Skip to content

menu

Reed Smith LLP logo
HomeAboutOur ServicesSubscribeTopicsContact
Search
Close

EHS Law Insights

Comment and analysis by Reed Smith lawyers on the latest developments in Environmental Health & Safety

Environmental, Social & Governance

Subscribe to Environmental, Social & Governance via RSS

The Biden Administration and U.S. Agencies Publish a Joint Policy Statement and Principles on Voluntary Carbon Markets

By Todd O. Maiden, Jennifer A. Smokelin, A.J. Wissinger & Clirae Bourke on 10 June 2024

Action

On May 28, 2024, the U.S. Departments of Treasury, Agriculture, Energy, and White House representatives published a joint Policy Statement on voluntary carbon markets (VCMs). The Policy Statement sets out seven principles to guide engagement with VCMs, and the principles are designed to ensure that VCMs are effective, fair, and equitable, and instill market…

Posted in Emerging Legislation and Regulation, Environmental, Social & Governance, Regulatory Compliance

SEC Approves Long Awaited Climate Disclosure Rules

By Jennifer A. Smokelin, Todd O. Maiden, Ben H. Patton, A.J. Wissinger, Peter Trimarchi, Mary M. Balaster, Megan Haines, Eric Schmoll & Sara M. Eddy on 11 March 2024

On March 6, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) approved the long awaited and controversial Climate-Related Disclosure Rules. The proposed rules were originally published in March 2022 and have undergone significant revisions since then. Per the SEC, “The final rules will become effective 60 days following publication of the adopting release in the Federal Register, and compliance dates for the rules will be phased in for all registrants, with the compliance date dependent on the registrant’s filer status.” While the final rules will be phased in over the next decade, certain parts are set to take effect for large companies in 2025.

Under the landmark final rules, registrants, which includes large accelerated filers, accelerated filers, and non-accelerated filers, will have to disclose Scope 1 and 2 emissions that have a “material” impact on their business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. Additionally, the rules require registrants to disclose the following:

  • Where a registrant has undertaken activities to mitigate or adapt to a material climate-related risk, a quantitative and qualitative description of material expenditures that directly result from such mitigation or adaptation activities;
  • A registrant’s activities, if any, to mitigate or adapt to a material climate-related risk including the use, if any, of transition plans, scenario analysis, or internal carbon prices;
  • Any oversight by the board of directors of climate-related risks and any role by management in assessing and managing the registrant’s material climate-related risks;
  • Any processes the registrant has for identifying, assessing, and managing material climate-related risks and, if the registrant is managing those risks, whether and how any such processes are integrated into the registrant’s overall risk management system or processes;
  • Information about a registrant’s climate-related targets or goals, if any, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s business, results of operations, or financial condition;
  • The capitalized costs, expenditures expensed, charges, and losses incurred as a result of severe weather events and other natural conditions; and
  • The capitalized costs, expenditures expensed, and losses related to carbon offsets and renewable energy credits or certificates if used as a material component of a registrant’s plans to achieve its disclosed climate-related targets or goals.

Continue Reading SEC Approves Long Awaited Climate Disclosure Rules

Posted in Emerging Legislation and Regulation, Environmental, Social & Governance
ESG - Environmental

Coming Soon: California Climate Disclosure Bills

By Todd O. Maiden, Eric Schmoll & Sara M. Eddy on 21 September 2023

California Governor Gavin Newsom recently pledged to sign two groundbreaking climate disclosure bills into law. These bills will mandate most large U.S. companies to reveal their complete emissions along their value chains and report on their financial risks and adaptation measures related to climate change.

The California Senate bills, SB 253 (“Climate Corporate Data Accountability…

Posted in Emerging Legislation and Regulation, Environmental, Social & Governance

Updates to SB 253: California’s Comprehensive Carbon Disclosure Legislation

By Todd O. Maiden, Sara M. Eddy & Eric Schmoll on 31 July 2023
Fire and water
Simon Hurry, Unsplash

As previously reported, California may soon pass the most stringent Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) disclosure requirements in the nation, surpassing even the current U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) proposed rules.

Since the California Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (aka “SB 253”) was introduced by Senator Scott Wiener, it has undergone several changes.

Posted in Emerging Legislation and Regulation, Environmental, Social & Governance

Full Value Chain Emission Disclosures – A California ESG Bill Resurrected

By Todd O. Maiden, Sara M. Eddy & Eric Schmoll on 28 March 2023

The California Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (“SB 253”) was recently introduced and passed the state’s Senate Environmental Quality Committee on March 15, 2023. SB 253 aims to broaden Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) state disclosure requirements, targeting high earning companies. A similar emissions disclosure bill, the Climate Corporate Accountability Act, failed to pass the…

Posted in Environmental, Social & Governance

RMP and PSM highly hazardous chemical regulations are back on the agenda

By Mary M. Balaster, Ben H. Patton & A.J. Wissinger on 27 May 2022

The agencies regulating industrial chemical processes are taking a second look at modernizing regulations aimed at preventing chemical accidents in the near future.  The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Process Safety Management (PSM) standard and the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Risk Management Program (RMP) rule were practically identical for processes containing threshold levels of…

Posted in Emerging Legislation and Regulation, Environmental, Social & Governance

Boron: Increase in domestic production for important mineral on the horizon

By Eric Schmoll on 28 April 2022

Boron can be found in electric vehicles, vital military hardware, wind turbines, solar panels, satellites, and more. The mineral – already listed as a national strategic mineral – is important for the United States’ economy, climate strategy, and national security. However, the U.S. Geological Survey has yet to include boron on the list of “critical minerals,” which the Energy Act of 2020 defines as a non-fuel mineral or mineral material essential to the economic or national security of the U.S. and which has a supply chain vulnerable to disruption. The lack of critical mineral designation could hamper the domestic production of boron, but that may be changing soon as discussed below.

California’s Mojave Desert is believed to have the world’s largest known new boron deposit. A mine in the region, known as Fort Cady, has an estimated mineral resource of 120 plus million tons of the type of borate, colemanite, which accounts for 90% of the mineral used globally. Fort Cady also has a large source of lithium (see our earlier post on lithium’s potential), which is an important element for batteries and electric vehicles. Fort Cady further benefits from proximity to an interstate highway, railroad, deep-water port, high voltage power line, gas line, and approved water infrastructure.

An industry leader in boron sourcing and processing is set to begin mining at Fort Cady soon, with small scale mining operations set to begin by the end of this year and large scale production by 2025. However, mining boron deposits is very costly and time consuming. Listing boron on the list of critical minerals would help alleviate such issues by giving stakeholders access to extensive government funding, incentives, and partnerships.Continue Reading Boron: Increase in domestic production for important mineral on the horizon

Posted in Environmental, Social & Governance

Scope 1 and 2 Emissions Attestation Requirements under SEC’s Proposed Climate Disclosure Rule

By Megan Haines, Todd O. Maiden, Ben H. Patton, Jennifer A. Smokelin, Mary M. Balaster & A.J. Wissinger on 25 March 2022

We previously reported on requirements for Scope 3 emissions in the proposed climate disclosure rule released by the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 21, 2022 (“Proposed Rule”). In addition to Scope 3 emissions, the Proposed Rule would also require a registrant to disclose information about its direct GHG emissions (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased electricity or energy sources (Scope 2). This post focuses on attestation requirements in the Proposed Rule for those Scope 1 and Scope 2 disclosures.

Who is subject to Scope 1 and Scope 2 attestation requirements and when is compliance required?

Section 229.1505 of the Proposed Rule would require a company that is an accelerated filer or large accelerated filer[1] to include an attestation report in its Scope 1 and 2 disclosures. The attestation requirement also applies to foreign private issuers.

The Proposed Rule does not make compliance with Scope 1 and 2 disclosure and attestation requirements immediate. Instead, subject companies are provided a grace period to achieve compliance with Scope 1 and 2 disclosure requirements. The Proposed Rule would also provide a transition period for the assurances required for the Scope 1 and 2 disclosure attestations (see further discussion below). The proposed compliance timeframes are as follows:

Filer Type   Scopes 1 and 2 GHG Disclosure Compliance Date Limited Assurance Reasonable Assurance
Accelerated Filer Fiscal year 2024 (filed in 2025) Fiscal year 2025 (filed in 2026) Fiscal year 2027 (filed in 2028)
Large Accelerated Filer Fiscal year 2023 (filed in 2024) Fiscal year 2024 (filed in 2025) Fiscal year 2026 (filed in 2027)

Who prepares the attestation report?

Under the Proposed Rule, a GHG emissions attestation provider would be required to prepare and sign the attestation report. The attestation provider would not need to be a registered public accounting firm. However, the Proposed Rule includes characteristics of acceptable attestation providers including:

  1. Expertise in GHG emission based on significant experience in measuring, analyzing, reporting, or attesting to GHG emissions.
  2. Independence from the reporting company and any of its affiliates.

According to the agency, the proposed expertise requirement is intended to ensure that the attestation provider is sufficiently competent to perform the attestation engagement. With respect to independence, SEC states that emissions disclosures by independent attestation providers should improve the reliability of the disclosure.Continue Reading Scope 1 and 2 Emissions Attestation Requirements under SEC’s Proposed Climate Disclosure Rule

Posted in Emerging Legislation and Regulation, Environmental, Social & Governance

Lithium Mining Around the Salton Sea: The Case for a “Win-Win” Outcome for Energy and the Environment

By Todd O. Maiden & Eric Schmoll on 25 March 2022

Rechargeable lithium-ion batteries increasingly power electric vehicles and a wide range of consumer electronics, and are a critical component of President Biden’s national strategy to eliminate carbon dioxide emissions from the US economy. To ramp up the domestic industry, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), in coordination with the U.S. Department of Labor and the AFL-CIO, recently announced the launch of a national workforce development strategy for lithium battery manufacturing. While a trained workforce is a necessary component of a lithium manufacturing strategy, the U.S. has historically been dependent upon overseas sources for lithium – but that could change with a new potential lithium source located around California’s Salton Sea.

Most of the world’s lithium supply is either mined from open pit mines, which are common in China and Australia, or extracted from salt lake flats (evaporative ponds) in South America. Both of these methods have serious environmental issues associated with them, or in the case of the evaporative ponds, are slow and economically inefficient. Extensive lithium deposits have been identified in Afghanistan and in parts of Africa, but those resources are limited for either geopolitical or environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) reasons.

The US has its own sources of lithium, but they too come with developmental concerns. New lithium mine proposals in the United States, including a site located on federal land in Nevada and a site outside Death Valley National Park, have triggered opposition from conservationists and Native American tribes.

But could the U.S. find an untapped source somewhere else that has far less environmental concerns? Enter California’s Imperial Valley and its troubled Salton Sea region.Continue Reading Lithium Mining Around the Salton Sea: The Case for a “Win-Win” Outcome for Energy and the Environment

Posted in Environmental, Social & Governance

The SEC’s proposed climate change rule: impact on private companies

By Megan Haines, Todd O. Maiden, Ben H. Patton & Jennifer A. Smokelin on 24 March 2022

The Securities and Exchange Commission recently proposed amendments to their existing disclosure policy that would require publicly traded corporations to disclose more information regarding climate change related risks, and how those risks may impact the company’s business and outlook (read, “bottom line and stock value”).  While the SEC regulates publicly traded corporations, privately held companies need to also track these proposed rule amendments:

  • The SEC has been requiring reporting on climate change / greenhouse gas emission information since 2010, so this overall concept is not new. However, the proposed disclosures would expand these obligation by requiring the publicly traded corporation to disclose (among other things):
    • The company’s process for identifying, managing, measuring and managing climate change risks;
    • If the company uses (“best,” “worst” and “most-likely” case) scenarios to assess risk, what assumptions and analytical choices the company uses to reach these outcomes;
    • The Company’s “direct” and “indirect” emissions (the latter, from purchased electricity or other forms of energy); and, of particular significance; and – possibly of greatest significance,
    • The Company’s indirect emissions from upstream and downstream activities.

This last bullet is far-reaching and likely to be controversial due to its impact on upstream privately held companies that sell products or services to publicly traded companies.  Should this proposal be promulgated:

  • Publicly traded companies will be obliged to make heightened demands upon their upstream vendors and suppliers to measure and disclose information re carbon dioxide (or other greenhouse gas) emissions associated with the sourcing, manufacture and transport of products to the SEC-regulated customer;
  • Commercial counter-parties should anticipate new terms in contracts that would require such disclosures from private companies – including possibly indemnification for misstatements about carbon emissions;
  • Small and medium-sized enterprise are likely not going to have in-house capabilities to perform such assessments, so an increased potential for out-sourcing this would be necessary if vendors want to remain on their customers’ “preferred provider” lists.

Continue Reading The SEC’s proposed climate change rule: impact on private companies

Posted in Emerging Legislation and Regulation, Environmental, Social & Governance

Post navigation

Older Posts 

EHS Law Insights

View Our Network of Blogs
Published by
Reed Smith LLP logo
RSS Facebook LinkedIn YouTube
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About Our Firm

At Reed Smith, everything we do is to apply our global experience in law to drive progress for our clients, for ourselves and for our communities. We are focused on outcomes, are highly collaborative and have deep industry insight. When combined with our local market knowledge and innovative mindset, this allows us to anticipate and address the needs of our clients and help them achieve their goals.

Our team of 3,000 people (including more than 1,700 lawyers) operate across 31 offices in the United States, Europe, the Middle East and Asia.

Read More...

Topics

Archives

Copyright © 2025, Reed Smith LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo