Skip to content

menu

Reed Smith LLP logo
HomeAboutOur ServicesSubscribeTopicsContact
Search
Close

EHS Law Insights

Comment and analysis by Reed Smith lawyers on the latest developments in Environmental Health & Safety

ESG Watch: Carbon Tax vs. Clean Energy Standard

By Jennifer A. Smokelin, Megan Haines, Daniella D. Landers, Todd O. Maiden & Ben H. Patton on 26 July 2021
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Many public companies are keeping a close watch on potential GHG regulations because the shape of these regulations can significantly affect their regulatory and reporting obligations and thus affect their ESG obligations. There is a significant difference between two recent proposals on that front.

CARBON TAX: The concept of a carbon tax is simple: fossil fuels bear a cost — climate change, as well as air pollution — that is not reflected in their price and thus “hidden”. A carbon tax would increase the price to reflect that hidden cost — by, say for example, $50 per ton of carbon dioxide emitted — and the market would work its magic to move the entire economy away from fossil fuels.

Yet for all their elegance and push for by economists, carbon taxes are politically unpopular.

Opponents of carbon taxes argue that a carbon price affects all of society, and therefore it increases costs for every energy consumer, without providing an immediate alternative. That means a publicly traded company that would not normally worry about – or report regarding – EPA obligations in the abstract turns out would have reporting and compliance obligations under a carbon tax regime and, therefore, a larger ESG burden.

This is likely why Biden’s climate plan leaves out a domestic tax on carbon, which for decades economists have championed as the gold standard of climate change mitigation.

CLEAN ENERGY STANDARD: The second method for reducing emissions — and the one Democrats are embracing — is a clean energy standard, which would legally require utilities to draw 80 percent of their electricity from zero-carbon sources by 2030 and 100 percent by 2035. Utilities that meet their targets would receive subsidies; those that don’t would get slapped with a fee, which in turn would be reinvested in zero-carbon energy technology.

Many economists agree that a clean energy standard is a less cost-efficient method of curbing emissions. At the same time, the targeted subsidy approach has advantages for technological innovation that carbon taxes lack.

Most important, clean energy standards have a proven track record. Since 2015, ten (10) states have passed their own 100% clean electricity standards.

BUT BEWARE: CARBON TAX NOT QUITE DEAD. The idea of a carbon tax lives on in the Democrats’ plan in the form of a carbon tariff, which would tax imports from countries that are not significantly reducing their own emissions. The implementation of this tariff scheme is fraught with potential error because experts agree a fair bit of estimation and imputation will be involved, and there will no doubt be arguments about the amount of the tariff set. Nonetheless, this approach seems to have some support.

Thus, international companies with an eye on their ESG burden should keep careful watch on proposed carbon tariff taxes as part of their ESG planning.

Posted in Emerging Legislation and Regulation, Environmental, Social & Governance, Incident Response
Tags: Biden administration, carbon, Chemicals, climate change, EPA, ESG
Photo of Jennifer A. Smokelin Jennifer A. Smokelin
Read more about Jennifer A. Smokelin
Photo of Megan Haines Megan Haines
Read more about Megan Haines
Photo of Daniella D. Landers Daniella D. Landers
Read more about Daniella D. LandersDaniella's Linkedin ProfileDaniella's Twitter Profile
Photo of Todd O. Maiden Todd O. Maiden
Read more about Todd O. Maiden
Photo of Ben H. Patton Ben H. Patton
Read more about Ben H. Patton
Related Posts
RMP and PSM highly hazardous chemical regulations are back on the agenda
May 27, 2022
Boron: Increase in domestic production for important mineral on the horizon
April 28, 2022
Scope 1 and 2 Emissions Attestation Requirements under SEC’s Proposed Climate Disclosure Rule
March 25, 2022

Subscribe to EHS Law Insights

Updates direct to your inbox
Subscribe by Email

EHS Law Insights

View Our Network of Blogs
Published by
Reed Smith LLP logo
RSS Twitter Facebook LinkedIn YouTube
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About Our Firm

Reed Smith represents many of the world’s leading companies in complex litigation and other high-stakes disputes, cross-border and other strategic transactions, and crucial regulatory matters. With lawyers from coast-to-coast in the United States, as well as in Europe, Asia and the Middle East, Reed Smith is known for its experience across a broad array of industry sectors.

Read More...

Topics

Archives

Copyright © 2023, Reed Smith LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo